the price of fx1800 is 2,5 times more than fx 1700 graphic card that is normally used in our company. how it truly differs from?
after short testing of 1700 there's some fading shadows of elements which i never face while working with 1800. i'm not admin so i suppose that 1800 is high fidelity or quality in screen. but is that something like driving a porsche in siberian bumpy roads while working hard with equipment moving copying streching primitives and subes, while rotating subes and primitives with different origin axis 8h/day? difference in graphic distance measurig between the sessions i have found always done on latter part of working day. is there some kind of buffer that could be full after certain number of commands?
the price of fx1800 is 2,5 times more than fx 1700 graphic card that is normally used in our company. how it truly differs from?
after short testing of 1700 there's some fading shadows of elements which i never face while working with 1800. i'm not admin so i suppose that 1800 is high fidelity or quality in screen. but is that something like driving a porsche in siberian bumpy roads while working hard with equipment moving copying streching primitives and subes, while rotating subes and primitives with different origin axis 8h/day? difference in graphic distance measurig between the sessions i have found always done on latter part of working day. is there some kind of buffer that could be full after certain number of commands?
