We have a own mto function to process the matc to an XLS file.
But we found a difference in boltlengths in the matc file which is generated at the same time with the isometric.
In the item description we have 85 mm and in the record number 500 is it 80 mm
500 16 0 0 8 2 80 11 0 0 0 0 0 0
-20 BH1005-M16
-21 85 mm x M16,
-1 Threaded pin
-1 with 2 nuts,
-1 A4-70/A4-70
this is what i found in the Isodraft reference manual.
Word Position Number Field Information Comments (inc. range of valid valuesand purpose if applicable)
1 Record type number Set to 500
2 Bolt diameter Diameters in mm or 1/16th inches
3 Not used
4 Not used
5 Quantity Set to number of bolts required
6 Fab/Erec marker 1 = Fabrication 2 = Erection
7 Bolt length Bolt lengths in mm
8 Part number
Has anybody seen this before or what are we doing wrong?
