in my catalogue until yesterday i do'nt need catref in the choose table because description like Cunipres mufe-mufe bend 90d was be absolutly enogh. But situation caused that i need this number - because i'm using to name SCOMs catalogue no of the part and i have four pcs of 3-way instruments with exacly the same GMSE and PTSE (parametrised) and only one difference betwen - catalogue no. Maby this is my faul but designer have CHOOSE table witch RTEXT of DETREF - like i wrote erlier - for four pcs exacly the same. For correctly identification of instrument he need CATREF (catalogue no) of the chosen component.
What do you think about that ? Maby faster and easier for me would be to devide CATE of elements and add cat no to RTEXT of DETREF ?
This is some type of solution of this problem but i try to use all of the capacity of the system witch i'm using.
Maby this modification is not to able to do without modifing pml scripts but i don't be afraid of that only were is it ?
in my catalogue until yesterday i do'nt need catref in the choose table because description like Cunipres mufe-mufe bend 90d was be absolutly enogh. But situation caused that i need this number - because i'm using to name SCOMs catalogue no of the part and i have four pcs of 3-way instruments with exacly the same GMSE and PTSE (parametrised) and only one difference betwen - catalogue no. Maby this is my faul but designer have CHOOSE table witch RTEXT of DETREF - like i wrote erlier - for four pcs exacly the same. For correctly identification of instrument he need CATREF (catalogue no) of the chosen component.
What do you think about that ? Maby faster and easier for me would be to devide CATE of elements and add cat no to RTEXT of DETREF ?
This is some type of solution of this problem but i try to use all of the capacity of the system witch i'm using.
Maby this modification is not to able to do without modifing pml scripts but i don't be afraid of that only were is it ?
