Have you solved your problem? If your answer is no then try the following
The stype normally accepts four charters only try to change [COLOR="red"]CNTRL [/COLOR]to [COLOR="red"]CNTR [/COLOR]or else if you really need to have more than four charters you can use [COLOR="red"]TEXT 'CNTRL' [/COLOR] instead of just CNTRL
[QUOTE=williams.richardson;62789]Have you solved your problem? If your answer is no then try the following
The stype normally accepts four charters only try to change [COLOR="red"]CNTRL [/COLOR]to [COLOR="red"]CNTR [/COLOR]or else if you really need to have more than four charters you can use [COLOR="red"]TEXT 'CNTRL' [/COLOR] instead of just CNTRL
[QUOTE=pitch;62786]you should not use pbor0 with a second bore. It should be used alone.
Pbor0 checks pbor1 first for a match then pbor2 if pbor1 does not match.
In your header you should use TYPE NAME PBOR1 PBOR2
Thanks for all your information pitch... let me try with ur suggestion... take care..
Yes, after the version 12 I made meinly the SPECS with CATVIEW, but I still use CATVIEW for reorder as default, for insert some componets because gives the name of the SPCO including the diameter, with PARAGON gives the name of the SPCO as ELBOW/1 , ELBOW/2, it's not clear. Yes you can use autonaming but it doesn't run for all the components ( it's part of other post).
I use also CATVIEW for search componets ( categories) more quickly than with PARAGON, because you can filter easily by TYPE and by STANDARDS ( Din, ANSI, or customized). Search is very powerful but it takes more time.
I wonder that CATVIEW continue for a long time until PARAGON can manage better the components.